male outdoor educators’ understandings of masculinity in practice: a north american case study
abstract
this exploratory, single embedded case study examined male outdoor educators’ understandings
of masculinity in the field and how such notions impact their practices. data were collected via
interviews (n = 18), observations of outdoor leaders’ practice (n = 8), and artifactual data
provided by participants’ employers. qualitative coding and analysis techniques were employed
within a framework shaped by hegemonic masculinity theory and informed by critical feminist
theory. findings indicate that these male outdoor leaders were expanding their skills to include
non-traditional gender practices in response to professional demands. they also indicated a
willingness to confront sexist language and behaviour of their 世界杯2022赛程表淘汰赛
. however, despite many
participants’ claims of progressive gender ideals, all demonstrated stereotypical masculine
performances, essentialist beliefs, and/or blinkered viewpoints. the apparent contradiction may
reflect that nearly all participants expressed confused or vague ideas about what it means to be a
man and a perception that the culture is changing rapidly, leading some to claim that they have
been vilified. participants’ take on gender equity also largely dovetailed with their employers’
training and resourcing. it is recommended that outdoor organizations continue to enhance their
work on gender equity and that organizations and outdoor leaders consider collective, rather than
individualistic, approaches to promoting gender equity and cultivating space for diverse gender
performances.