comparative assessment of sfmm/stanley & complan for forest management planning in ontario
abstract
the growing complexity of forest management planning issues requires the best
planning tools available. a key question facing forest management planners in ontario
is whether sfmm (and its harvest-blocking tool stanley) are the appropriate tools. the
most effective method to evaluate sfmm/stanley’s appropriateness is to compare it
with a model proven in other jurisdictions.
through the study the differences in the approaches to forest management taken by
each model became apparent. the differences between optimization and simulation
apart, the biggest difference derived from the role the model developers envisioned for
their model. sfmm was designed as a tool to develop management strategies in even-aged
forests. the scope is over a large area and long timeframe, typical of preparing a
forest management plan in the province, this makes allowance for a loss of a certain
amount of detail. complan was designed in partnership with industrial clients and
emphasizes operational considerations, much more so than sfmm. complan
attempts to maintain as much detail as possible. the model also integrates the spatial
component into the operational planning, as spatial constraints are identified as a key
factor in the operational planning process.
collections
- retrospective theses [1604]